首页> 外文OA文献 >Coexistence of ipsilateral pain-inhibitory and facilitatory processes after high-frequency electrical stimulation
【2h】

Coexistence of ipsilateral pain-inhibitory and facilitatory processes after high-frequency electrical stimulation

机译:高频电刺激后同侧疼痛抑制和促进过程共存

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: High-frequency electrical stimulation (HFS) of the human forearm evokes analgesia to blunt pressure in the ipsilateral forehead, consistent with descending ipsilateral inhibitory pain modulation. The aim of the current study was to further delineate pain modulation processes evoked by HFS by examining sensory changes in the arm and forehead; investigating the effects of HFS on nociceptive blink reflexes elicited by supraorbital electrical stimulation; and assessing effects of counter-irritation (electrically evoked pain at the HFS-conditioned site in the forearm) on nociceptive blink reflexes before and after HFS.\udMETHODS: Before and after HFS conditioning, sensitivity to heat and to blunt and sharp stimuli was assessed at and adjacent to the conditioned site in the forearm and on each side of the forehead. Nociceptive blink reflexes were also assessed before and after HFS with and without counter-irritation of the forearm.\udRESULTS: HFS triggered secondary hyperalgesia in the forearm (a sign of central sensitization) and analgesia to blunt pressure in the ipsilateral forehead. Under most conditions, both HFS conditioning and counter-irritation of the forearm suppressed electrically evoked pain in the forehead, and the amplitude of the blink reflex to supraorbital stimuli decreased. Importantly, however, in the absence of forearm counter-irritation, HFS conditioning facilitated ipsilateral blink reflex amplitude to supraorbital stimuli delivered ipsilateral to the HFS-conditioned site.\udCONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that HFS concurrently triggers hemilateral inhibitory and facilitatory influences on nociceptive processing over and above more general effects of counter-irritation. The inhibitory influence may help limit the spread of sensitization in central nociceptive pathways.
机译:背景:人类前臂的高频电刺激(HFS)引起镇痛使同侧前额的压力变钝,这与同侧抑制性疼痛调节下降有关。本研究的目的是通过检查手臂和额头的感觉变化来进一步描述HFS引起的疼痛调节过程。研究HFS对眶上电刺激引起的伤害性眨眼反射的影响;并评估反刺激(前臂HFS调节部位的电诱发疼痛)对HFS前后伤害性眨眼反射的影响。\ udMETDS:在HFS调节前后,评估了对热以及钝性和尖锐刺激的敏感性在前臂和前额每一侧的适应部位附近。在有和没有前臂反刺激的情况下,还评估了HFS之前和之后的伤害性眨眼反射。\结果:HFS触发了前臂的继发性痛觉过敏(中枢敏化的征兆)和镇痛作用,以减轻同侧前额的压力。在大多数情况下,HFS调节和前臂反刺激都可以抑制前额的电诱发疼痛,眨眼反射对眶上刺激的幅度会降低。重要的是,在没有前臂反刺激的情况下,HFS调理促进了同侧眨眼反射幅度向眶上刺激的传递,从而将同侧转移到HFS调理部位。\ ud结论:这些发现表明,HFS同时触发了对伤害性加工的半边抑制和促进作用。除了更普遍的抗刺激作用。抑制作用可能有助于限制敏化在中枢伤害感受途径中的传播。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vo, L.; Drummond, P.D.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号